Capital Punishment Is Morally and Legally Wrong Presentation

Introduction: Capital Punishment

  • Capital punishment, also referred to as dying penalty, is killing an individual to punish her or him for capital offenses (Hood & Hoyle, 2015).
  • Capital crimes might embrace homicide, genocide, treason, et cetera, whereas strategies are electrocution, deadly injection, hanging, fuel chamber, and so forth.
  • Capital punishment is legally and morally unsuitable as that is an irreversible motion that deprives an individual of the essential proper to life.

The drawback of the dying penalty is advanced and multifaceted. It impacts the political, authorized, ethical, cultural, and different fields of life. The absence or presence of the dying penalty could also be thought of an indicator of the extent of tradition and high quality of life.

We will write a customized Presentation on Capital Punishment Is Morally and Legally Wrong particularly for you
for under $16.05 $11/web page

807 licensed writers on-line

Learn More

Capital Punishment is Morally Wrong

Arguments Against

  • Thousands of harmless persons are killed;
  • Capital punishment is irreversible;
  • It is financially and racially biased;
  • Such a choice could also be probably unfair and invalid;
  • While homicide is morally impermissible, capital punishment is a homicide (Mathias, 2013).

The dying penalty is a measure of legal punishment. Of all crimes, homicide is the best diploma of wrongfulness and immorality. Based on the precept of humanism, it may be argued that life is sacred, and that is the untouchable wealth of each individual. As one of many commandments says: “do not kill”, the society ought to worth the life of each particular person, and each individual ought to worth his or her life and people of others.

From the standpoint of an individual who expects the dying penalty, it’s a disaster – the expectation itself, particularly if an individual continues to be younger or if the crime just isn’t so critical, just isn’t price such a critical punishment. The society destroys such criminals as a result of it opposes itself to them. Lots of people die harmless as a result of errors in investigations and courtroom choices. The invalid and unfair actions solely worsen the crime charges and result in the society brutalization.

Capital Punishment is Legally Wrong

Arguments Against

  • Deprivation of the basic proper to life;
  • Depreciation of 1’s life that may be made by others;
  • Execution of an harmless individual;
  • Promotion of retribution as a type of vengeance;
  • Failure to discourage others from committing crimes Levinson, Smith, & Young, 2014);
  • Society and regulation brutalization.

In phrases of the authorized side, one ought to stress that the appropriate to life is key, and nobody might be taken away from it, even when an individual is dedicated the homicide. The capital punishment is the cruelest approach of revenge. An individual just isn’t given any alternative to atone for his or her guilt; subsequently, the dying penalty is thought to be an unlawful usurpation of the pure proper to life, which everybody inherently possesses, even the worst individual. In different phrases, there isn’t a equivalence and adequacy, and the dying penalty could also be equated to essentially the most deliberate of murders.

Consequence s of Death Penalty

Cruelty, degradation, and inhumanity are the principle consensus of capital punishment.

Both morally and legally, it’s incorrect because it destroys the society and contradicts the worth of human life.

The implementation of the dying penalty fails to discourage others from committing crimes despite the fact that it’s the most extreme punishment. As a outcome, the society turns into brutal and tends to be missing the understanding of the human life worth. It is essential for folks to hold an concept that the dying penalty is all the time unsuitable as it’s incorrect to kill.

Get your 100% authentic paper on any subject finished
in as little as 3 hours
Learn More


Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The dying penalty: A worldwide perspective, (fifth ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, J. D., Smith, R. J., & Young, D. M. (2014). Devaluing dying: An empirical research of implicit racial bias on jury-eligible residents in six dying penalty states. New York University Law Review, 89(2), 513-532.

Mathias, M. D. (2013). The sacralization of the person: Human rights and the abolition of the dying penalty. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1246-1283.

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Order a Paper Now