Counselling and Psychotherapy: The Role of Humour Thesis


The position of humour in counselling and psychotherapy has change into an space of eager curiosity for researchers within the area. Experts more and more recognise humours’ constructive position in remedy, however its utility is to be executed with care. The current thesis critiques the literary perception into the therapeutic use of humour from the standpoints of Psychodynamic, Cognitive-Behavioural, and Humanistic/Existential views. The main function of humour is to be a social lubricant, serving to the shopper and therapist set up a powerful therapeutic alliance. In this regard, humour is to stick to moral requirements of secure observe, that means that it must be acceptable and tailor-made to particular shopper circumstances. Next, the paper argues that humourous change may be produced inappropriately, which is especially topical in counselling right now. The paper additionally critiques the constructive facets of correct humour implementation, akin to assuaging stress and enabling efficient coping mechanisms. Lastly, the literature reveals that humour is an efficient therapeutic technique that may be utilised in a wide selection of settings.

We will write a customized Thesis on Counselling and Psychotherapy: The Role of Humour particularly for you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page

807 licensed writers on-line

Learn More


A rising variety of practitioners have voiced collective curiosity within the position of humour in counselling and psychotherapy. Indeed, Corey (2013, p.31) said that remedy is ‘a responsible endeavour, but it need not be a deadly serious one’. Furthermore, humour appears pertinent and relevant to just about all therapeutic approaches, spanning from psychodynamic and humanistic/existential oriented clinicians to these with a basis in cognitive behavioural remedy. For this purpose, chapter one will cowl the theoretical bases of humour inside counselling. Likewise, traditionally there seems to have been a lot enthusiasm for using humour inside remedy. This is evidenced by the various books and papers written on the subject by well-known therapists akin to Freud (1960), Ellis (2007) and Frankl (1975). On the opposite hand, outdoors of anecdotal proof and private expertise, the quantity of empirical analysis round using humour in remedy is undeniably little by comparability. Nevertheless, given humours’ advanced nature, such managed analysis will not be all the time simply acquired.

Moreover, chapter two will take a look at the sensible purposes of humour. Perhaps not unexpectedly, humour seems comparatively typically in every kind of social exchanges, and psychotherapy is not any exception. Similarly, humour may be utilized each appropriately and inappropriately. Thus, practitioners concerned on this space of examine fluctuate between those that ardently assist its use to those that keep a extra sceptical place. Hence, subjects to be examined embrace humour as technique of bolstering the therapeutic alliance and humour as a possible diagnostic/evaluation instrument earlier than concluding with potential dangers concerned in its use. Finally, chapter three will contact on humours innumerable advantages to 1’s total well being and well-being, together with diminished stress, higher resilience and decreased depressive and nervousness associated signs (“Association for Applied and Therapeutic Humour”, 2021). In essence, this thesis intends to argue for humour’s therapeutic worth supplied it’s integrated sensibly.

Chapter One – Perspectives on Humour from Three Core Therapeutic Modalities

Psychodynamic Perspective (Sigmund Freud)

Freud’s affect on psychological well being highlighted the unconscious processes that form our actions (Christoff & Dauphin, 2020). His psychoanalytic mannequin offers with the psyche’s metaphoric constructions, particularly the id, ego, and superego. The id pertains to concepts of delight and needs, the ego with the person and realism, and the superego with morality and integrity. The stress between these three constructions needs stability and liberating of psychological power to protect a powerful construction (Boag, 2014). As such, ‘humour may be one way to release sexual energy and provide catharsis’ (Gibson, 2019, p.187).

When observing a shopper’s dysfunctional behaviours, therapists could think about three concepts regarding Freudian concept on humour. Firstly, humour conceals taboo emotions of superiority or sexual need, which might induce guilt. In this manner, humour acts as ‘a guilty pleasure’. Secondly, humour can obscure emotions of aggression or hostility that one could not consciously admit to. Thus, ‘humour is a way for conscious expression of repressed feelings’. Finally, humour can act as a wholesome defence mechanism by gently redirecting aggressive impulses. This method, one will likely be much less more likely to have interaction in aggressive and dangerous acts (Gibson, 2019, p.188).

Guilty Desires

Delighting in humour could yield guilt or incite rigidity in our superego since that component contradicts its moralistic wants. One may additionally really feel guilt round producing and appreciating humour as a result of it asserts dominance or superiority over others (Ferguson & Ford, 2008). Freud remarked {that a} superior mind-set fed aggression (Ferguson & Ford, 2008). Typically, aggression is taken into account inappropriate in social exchanges, and due to this fact battle arises when the id needs to be hostile. However, the ego and superego forestall this undesirable behaviour from occurring (Freud, 1960). In this manner, humour excuses such hostility by masking it as acceptable (Christoff & Dauphin, 2020). Such humour could seem pleasant, however it’s, in actual fact, disparaging. In different phrases, this behaviour may very well be thought of passive-aggressive. Such a cover-up lets one be offensive or spiteful, and since it’s ‘just a joke’, one’s guilt is mitigated (Gibson, 2019).

Voicing of repressed emotions

Freud hypothesised that emotions which the ‘conscious mind cannot handle are repressed, placed out of our awareness’ (Gibson, 2019, p.189). Nevertheless, these blocked emotions are the foundation of many struggles for shoppers and are uncovered in different methods. Freud claimed that humour was an environment friendly means to disburse psychic power or keep stability in order that the system’s aims had been achieved by voicing unconscious needs by means of humour as an alternative of expressing one’s real emotions (Christoff & Dauphin, 2020; Freud, 1960; Swaminath, 2006). One could not consciously settle for our choice for aggression, superiority or sexual impulses, so one engages in jokes to disguise one’s guilt-ridden needs (Christoff & Dauphin, 2020). This concept contrasts from the sooner theme as a result of, within the earlier level, lessening of guilt impressed humour, whereas on this case, repressed materials provokes it. For occasion, this idea of repressed ideas said by means of humour pertains to the vagueness inherent in prejudiced or sexist jokes (Mallett et al., 2016). If one likes to precise or hear a racist joke, one may purpose that one will not be racist as a result of it’s merely a joke, however it’s potential that one is racist and compensating by means of using such humour. Freud’s mannequin succumbs to the concept that unconscious motivations make clear this humour’s enjoyment (Gibson, 2019).

Get your 100% unique paper on any matter carried out
in as little as 3 hours
Learn More

An Adaptive defence mechanism

Lastly, Freud’s idea of stability between ego, superego, and id affords an extra position of humour. If the id needs to claim its sexual needs or hostile emotions, however the superego creates guilt and stops these from accessing the aware thoughts, stress builds throughout the psyche (Christoff & Dauphin, 2020). Gibson (2019, p.190) notes that very like ‘the release of steam in a steam-engine train, this tension must be released’. Otherwise, ‘the system malfunctions’. Thus, Freud claimed that laughter diminished this buildup of rigidity. In this manner, as an alternative choice to shopper bodily aggression, which might be thought of maladaptive behaviour, humour acts as an appropriate means to cope with the battle between these three constructions (Connor et al., 2019). Hence, the well-known expression ‘blowing off steam’ recognised by many individuals right now (Gibson, 2019, p.190). Given the potential roles of humour above, the creator believes that the remedy room may act as a haven for shoppers to gratify these needs. In this view, shopper humour should be inspired in remedy. Moreover, humour made on behalf of the shopper throughout remedy periods could assist the therapist perceive and provides perception into the shopper’s elementary points (See Chapter Two for additional dialogue).

Cognitive-Behavioural Perspective (Albert Ellis)

One different acquainted fashion of remedy that embraces humour is Rational-Emotive-Behaviour Therapy (REBT), based by Albert Ellis (Dryden & Branch, 2008; Ellis & Dryden, 2007; Saper, 1987). While Freud could have examined humour and its connection to the unconscious, Ellis deliberately used humour to assist shoppers alter irrational beliefs and self-sabotaging behaviour (Saper, 1987). Consequently, the remedy’s aim is to check and refute shoppers’ faulty beliefs and substitute them with extra correct and versatile expectations and views. One technique of carrying out that is for the therapist to observe humorous hyperbole and even irony to name consideration to the ridiculousness of shoppers’ unreasonable perception programs (Ellis & Miller, 2012). In a video interview, Ellis spoke that ‘people disturb themselves; they don’t get disturbed’ (Psychotherapy.web, 2012).

He later claimed that people ‘first take adversities, hassles, and life problems seriously, which is good, but then they take them too seriously and lose their sense of humour’ (Psychotherapy.web, 2012). Likewise, Ellis held the view that people unsettled themselves by means of their irrational considering patterns, emotions and actions. The very coronary heart of humour exerts itself on all three of those ranges (Ellis & Dryden, 2007; Psychotherapy.web, 2012; Saper, 1987; Sultanoff, 2013). Cognitively, it astutely and persuasively affords a recent perspective to the all-or-nothing and rigid shopper. Emotively, humour brings pleasure and laughter, makes life appear significant, and actively interrupts emotions of despair and apathy. Behaviorally, it conjures up completely different actions akin to independently producing direct opposition to nervousness and helps folks in rest by momentary distraction (Saper, 1987). Thus, Saper (1987, p.361) asserts that ‘if clients can even briefly experience amusement, it can serve as an antidote to client sadness’. Finally, therapist humour might help shoppers settle for life’s uncertainties and foster a wholesome open-mindedness to the world round them (Psychotherapy.web, 2012).

Nevertheless, detractors of REBT’s in depth use of humour allude to the truth that it appears to endorse an aggressive and confrontational method to remedy (Ellis & Miller, 2012). While Ellis’s humour observe seems to be somewhat aggressive, he did acknowledge its potential for hurt by stressing the significance of implementing humour in a fashion that acknowledged and accepted shoppers regardless of their errors and shortcomings (Ellis & Miller, 2012). The creator would agree that given the likelihood for shopper hurt, such humour would certainly should be administered very fastidiously and competently, if in any respect.

Humanistic-Existential Perspective (Maslow, Rogers, May, Frankl, Farrelly)

There have been quite a few approaches to using humour below the Humanistic/Existential umbrella. Some therapists have created therapies the place humour is the chief element of the method, whereas others have used humour as a therapeutic approach (Frankl, 1975; Rutherford, 1994; Saper, 1987). According to such approaches, a humorous outlook on life will not be solely a elementary measure of psychological well being, but in addition a technique of preserving and supporting wholesome dwelling (Martin & Ford, 2007). For occasion, Maslow and Rogers agreed that humour is one attribute noticed in totally functioning people. Such a character trait is a mark of a wholesome thoughts in that one can chortle at tough life circumstances and nonetheless transfer on with their lives (Dziegielewski et al., 2003).

Likewise, Existentialism means that humour is freedom from the confines of actuality and life’s hardships (Gibson, 2019). Client behaviour that might seem counterproductive to 1’s objectives may result from such a lack of freedom (Gibson, 2019). Hence, Gibson (2019, p.195) states that one is wholesome and content material when one is ‘free and not slaves or prisoners of our feelings and desires’. Similarly, Existential psychologist Rollo May specified how humour works as a ‘healthy way of feeling a ‘distance’ between oneself and the issue, a method of standing off and taking a look at one’s drawback with perspective’ (May, 2009, p.24). Another famend therapeutic observe that has been thought to be being constructed on humour is ‘paradoxical intention’, established by Existentialist Viktor Frankl (Frankl, 1975). In this process, shoppers are suggested to overstate the bleakness of their issues (Saper, 1987). For occasion, Frankl would typically ‘tell a joke to depressed clients, let them laugh and then tell them they could not laugh! Why not? Because laughter is incompatible with depression’ (Rutherford, 1994, p.213).

Furthermore, Frank Farrelly’s Provocative remedy is an tailored model of the Person-Centred method (Kemp, 2015; Saper, 1987). Saper (1987, p.360) describes how therapists on this remedy fashion try and be provocative and self-revealing by utilizing strategies akin to ‘exaggeration, mimicry, ridicule, distortion, sarcasm, irony, and jokes’. Such methods convey consideration to self-sabotaging behaviours whereas concurrently exposing shopper anxieties and self-limiting beliefs (Saper, 1987). Given this supposed shopper centred method, the creator would query its perspective on core circumstances akin to shopper assist, heat, and unconditional constructive regard. Fortunately, Farrelly responded to this concern with some clarifications. Firstly, the provocative therapist will not be mocking the shopper personally however is as an alternative teasing their ineffective behaviours. Secondly, Farrelly agreed that his strategies may initially set off unease in shoppers however made a distinction between brief time period ache and long-term acquire. ‘Often in therapy, a distinction must be made between short-term cruelty with long-term kindness versus short-term kindness and long-term detriment’ (Saper, 1987, p.361). Despite such reassurances, one would nonetheless envisage this therapeutic method as probably having extra vital dangers than its extra conservative counterparts. Hence, the creator would carry comparable reservations about this remedy fashion as those held for Ellis’s humorous methods in REBT.

We will write a customized Thesis on Counselling and Psychotherapy: The Role of Humour particularly for you!
Get your first paper with 15% OFF
Learn More

Now that some theoretical backgrounds of humour have been noticed, one will study the medical features of humour because it pertains to present counselling observe.

Chapter Two – Practising Humour within the Therapy Room

Establishing a therapeutic relationship – humour as a social lubricant

One of the vital parts of profitable remedy is the energy of the therapeutic relationship (Cooper, 2008). As such, humour has the ability to attach folks and improve the therapeutic relationship, for it recognises the shopper’s and counsellor’s shared mortality (Dryden & Branch, 2008; Richman, 1996). In common life, humour generally kinds a bond between folks and encourages relationship improvement. Likewise, humour can have comparable leads to the therapeutic setting and assist understanding (Dziegielewski et al., 2003). Hence, humour ‘can be one of the sweetest builders of a warm, connected therapeutic relationship, giving a shared language to both people in the dyad’ (Evans, 2015, p.129).

Moreover, humour can provide method to a extra ‘normal’ dialogue which often contributes considerably to a shopper’s consolation stage within the remedy room (Haig, 1986; Martin & Ford, 2007). As a consequence, shoppers who reveal little all through dialog as a type of self-defence could also be extra prepared to be susceptible (Dionigi & Canestrari, 2018). Similarly, collective disclosures through humorous observations or jokes enable for confidence to be constructed within the therapeutic relationship and afford the therapist deeper shopper empathy (Dziegielewski et al., 2003; Sultanoff, 2013). Likewise, a shopper’s use of humour in remedy is usually a dependable gauge of the energy and belief inherent within the relationship. One is more likely to belief one other if one is to be courageous sufficient to seem silly within the presence of one other (Dziegielewski et al., 2003). Digney (2014, p.19) speaks up to now by arguing that folks instinctively know when somebody is anxious for us. Such care is commonly revealed through the eye one receives. A secure and open setting is forged when one can partake in laughter, share a joke or have interaction in humorous change. The creator factors out that such humour not directly communicates the message ‘I care about you’. He maintains that such indirectness may be extra useful than explicitly stating it to somebody.

Additionally, Mosak (1987) explains how non-public jokes typically develop between therapist and shopper in a long-term relationship. The ‘In-joke’ between therapist and shopper conveys the identical message because it does for any in-group, that ‘we are in a special relationship,’ thus sustaining and growing rapport (Mosak, 1987, p.39). Equally, Mosak (1987, p.27) describes how Adlerians would perceive remedy as an ‘educational and re-educational process’ and imagine that information accumulation ensues extra freely in a stress-free setting. As such, ‘The low level of tension facilitates a cooperative task-solving approach’ (Mosak, 1987, p.27).

Furthermore, humour is a technique of communication. Brooks et al. (2020) and Haig (1986) talk about banter as a communication instrument that shoppers could use in remedy and thereby require a therapist to reciprocate in such an method. Ultimately, the aim of such banter could be to boost the therapeutic work/relationship. Haig (1986) and Prerost (1984) notice that kids could have difficulties partaking in remedy in the event that they felt considerably patronised, so banter could scale back nervousness on this space as nicely. Finally, ‘humour is chemical and wired into our neurology’. Thus, ‘laughter sets up the release of oxytocin and vasopressin in the brain, peptide hormones linked to bonding and attachment’, additional highlighting humour’s social operate (Digney, 2014, p.7).

Humour as a instrument for shopper evaluation, prognosis, and therapeutic intervention


Humour made on behalf of the shopper typically offers therapists beneficial data round their insights, emotional state, attitudes, and expectations. By taking such data into consideration, therapists could obtain a extra thorough shopper conception (Haig, 1986; Martin & Ford, 2007). For occasion, Gibson (2019, p.206) believed that ‘clients’ humour could reveal battle (aggressive humour), management (taking away therapist’s management of the discuss), or concealment (avoiding points)’. Haig (1986) additionally listed how humour can be utilized positively in supporting shopper prognosis. For instance, any response to or use of humour could specify a shopper’s emotional maturity, worsening of signs or transferential materials. Hence, laughter may be an insightful admission by the person collaborating within the laughing (Mosak, 1987). In this manner, German novelist Goethe’s declare that ‘Men show their character in nothing more clearly than in what they think laughable’ seems to be fairly apt on this occasion (Martin & Ford, 2007). Additionally, Goldin & Bordan (1999) talk about how completely different therapeutic modalities may view a shopper’s lack of humour. For instance, grownup youngsters of alcoholic mother and father might need hassle having enjoyable and enjoyable in social settings. Likewise, in Transactional Analysis, a shopper’s lack of ability to take pleasure in humour may point out an ego state dysfunction stemming from unduly punitive parenting.

Therapeutic Intervention

Furthermore, humour is usually a beneficial intervention approach. Like all therapeutic interventions, it have to be carried out for the potential profit it might need for the shopper (Dryden & Branch, 2008; Ellis & Dryden, 2007; Frankl, 1965; Franzini, 2001). As such, finest observe would point out that therapists don’t make jokes on the shopper’s expense or observe humour to ease their very own nervousness throughout a session (Dryden & Branch, 2008). Gibson & Tantam (2018, p.71) declare that humour can even act as a catalyst for inner motion inside a shopper, ‘resulting in a change of perspective, values and behaviour’. In this manner, humour can enable shoppers to view dysfunctional considering and behavior patterns extra positively and expansively. (Dryden & Branch, 2008; Haig, 1986) Likewise, Mosak (1987) argues that therapists could implement jokes to generate momentum in intervals the place remedy has plateaued. It can act as a technique of difficult shoppers on potential false agendas (Mosak, 1987).

Moreover, jokes let therapists observe an interpretation fashion that shoppers could understand as much less inauspicious than a extra conventional interpretation. Hence, a straight-faced interpretation could also be much less tolerable than one expressed humorously. Such an method may likewise enable one to state the reason for shopper difficulties extra tactfully (Ellis & Dryden, 2007). Mosak (1987) factors out that each one types of psychotherapy have the potential to be hazardous. Nevertheless, if remedy is to flourish, each therapist and shopper should take dangers. ‘Too safe, and there is no reason to move; too risky, and there is no support for movement’ (Mosak, 1987, p.42). In this fashion, Mosak (1987) argues that humour carries no extra risks with it than another type of therapist interpretation. Perhaps then the vital element in humour’s sensible use is therapist timing (Goldin & Bordan, 1999). Humour used too unexpectedly can provide the impression of incompetence or any individual who is nearly resistant to the shopper’s issues. If used too late, it could actually seem unrelated to the current second (Evans, 2015; Goldin & Bordan, 1999).

Not certain should you can write a paper on Counselling and Psychotherapy: The Role of Humour by your self? We might help you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page
Learn More

Potential dangers of implementing therapeutic humour

Some critics declare that humour used as a method is finest overlooked of remedy. The detractors argue that too many hazards exist and never well worth the dangers concerned. In different phrases, there’s a increased probability of shopper hurt and wrongdoing (Shaughnessy & Wadsworth, 1992). Moreover, there are events when shoppers use laughter ‘to cover up anxiety or escape from the experience of facing threatening material’ (Corey, 2013, p.31). Thus, the therapist should differentiate between humour that diverts and humour that progresses remedy (Corey, 2013).

Furthermore, as cited by (Rutherford, 1994), Kubie voiced sturdy issues concerning using humour in psychoanalysis, believing that it may inhibit free associations. He additionally thought that therapists may use humour to reduce their very own anxieties and fears round particular shoppers. For occasion, therapists may sometimes really feel uncomfortable round a shopper’s presenting problem and due to this fact implement humour as a way of coping as an alternative of addressing points overtly. In such conditions, the therapist may use humour to sidetrack the shopper and not directly change the course of the dialogue. When therapists have interaction in humour, shoppers might also get the impression that they can’t voice emotions of annoyance and unwillingly really feel pushed into compliance. Consequently, Martin & Ford (2007) advise therapists to train some introspectivity and think about whether or not they’re utilizing humour as a type of self-defence. Finally, the place humour is misused, shoppers could change into confused and query the therapist’s sincerity (Rutherford, 1994).

Haig (1986) additionally reminds us of humour’s double-edged nature by itemizing a number of methods during which humour is more likely to be unhelpful. One such shopper is the ‘people pleaser’ who may use humour to achieve therapist acceptance. For occasion, the shopper could try and stroke the therapist’s ego by amusing them or, extra importantly, hiding any potential resentment felt in the direction of them. On the opposite hand, the therapist could use humour in an egotistical method to validate their intelligence or use dry humour to criticise the shopper. Moreover, as cited by (Franzini, 2001), Kuhlman argues that poorly timed humour could alter shopper emotions when expressing such emotions would have been therapeutic. In this manner, Goldin et al. (2006) state that humour will not be acceptable when shoppers are affected by emotions of melancholy or going by means of the grieving course of. Similarly, the authors advocate that therapists be suspicious of shopper humour that appears to assist unhelpful behaviours. In such examples, therapists must abstain from coercing with shoppers. Engaging with the shopper on this humour sends the message that one helps such behaviour, which works towards remedy and shopper progress objectives (Goldin et al., 2006).

Nonetheless, Evans (2015) argues that this shadier facet to humour is one therapist hardly ever acknowledge. ‘When humour tips over into cruelty, mockery, snideness or sarcasm it can be experienced as wounding, excluding, judging and devastating by those who feel like the target’ (Evans, 2015, p.130). Such is the case particularly for people who’ve chronically discovered themselves on the fallacious finish of others’ gags up to now. As such, they might be overanxious round others’ intentions, seeing real jokes as protecting for hid disclosures supposed to insult (Evans, 2015). Similarly, when the therapeutic relationship has not been established, the upper the possibility for shopper hurt as our humorous intentions could also be misinterpret. Consequently, Evans (2015, p.131) highlights the beneath three questions which practitioners can mirror on earlier than implementing humour.

  • Has the shopper ceaselessly skilled humour used as a weapon towards them?
  • Do they’ve a deep historical past embedded with disgrace, feeling humiliated, shy, or extremely anxious?
  • Are there cultural, language, or gender issues that will improve the shopper’s chance of bewilderment?

Moreover, Richman (1996) and Maples et al. (2001) echo the above sentiments, advising counsellors working with people of various cultural backgrounds to pay attention to the completely different meanings probably related to humour. Not all cultures specific and admire humour in the identical method. Interestingly, Salameh, as cited by (Saper, 1987) established a five-point score scale for categorising the extent humour was helpful or damaging in remedy, presumably because of such shopper safety points. The scale commences with harmful humour. Such humour would include unfavorable and mean-spirited feedback designed to harm the shopper. Following on then from that is dangerous humour, minimally useful humour, very useful humour, and excellent humour. This final stage (Level 5) is outlined as empathetic humour, happens naturally, and helps create shopper change and progress.

Hence, chapter three will take a look at these extra helpful facets of humour because it pertains to psychological wellbeing.

Chapter Three – Humour and its Role in Psychological Wellbeing

Humour as a coping mechanism for stress

Research has provided in depth backing for the concept that humour regulates feelings that positively relate to psychological wellbeing (Abel, 1998; Abel & Maxwell, 2002; Akram et al., 2020; Cann et al., 2000; Cann & Collette, 2014; Crawford & Caltabiano, 2011; Kuiper, 2012; Perchtold et al., 2019; Samson & Gross, 2012; Tugade et al., 2004). Firstly, humour lessens the dangerous affect of nerve-racking occasions by producing an optimistic viewpoint for understanding worrying occasions (Conversano et al., 2010; Dziegielewski et al., 2003; Morgan et al., 2019). Secondly, it weakens undesirable emotional responses to the calls for of life by discouraging unfavorable concepts rather than constructive ones (Martin & Ford, 2007; Samson & Gross, 2012). As American singer Lena Horne as soon as claimed, ‘It’s not the load that breaks you down, it’s the best way you carry it’ (Gibson, 2019). Thus, humour permits people to reevaluate nerve-racking occasions in lighter, much less alarming methods and subsequently expertise much less emotional struggling.

Numerous authors have echoed this stance (Abel, 1998; Abel & Maxwell, 2002; Ellis & Dryden, 2007; Frankl, 2004; Freud, 1960; May, 2009; Samson & Gross, 2012). Moreover, society right now consists of a number of stressors, and thus shopper points could current in lots of kinds (Yim, 2016). For occasion, bodily stressors may embrace complications, emotional stressors akin to nervousness and melancholy and social stressors akin to relationship breakups (Gibson, 2019). Likewise, authors Boyle & Joss-Reid (2004) describe how humour helps wholesome and unhealthy people handle stress for various causes. For instance, hospital sufferers observe humour to endure long-lasting ache, school college students observe humour to reduce the nervousness related to assignments, and wholesome people use humour to protect power and psychological wellbeing. Cheng & Wang (2014) additionally instructed that humour restores one’s psychological reserves that usually change into depleted by tasks one finds discouraging. In this manner, they argue that humour helps a persistent and resilient outlook on life as it’s each bodily and emotionally invigorating.

Humour as a coping mechanism for melancholy and nervousness

Just a few authors keep that present process antagonistic life occasions makes yet another inclined to nervousness and melancholy (Gibson, 2019; Hassanzadeh et al., 2017). Nonetheless, if one makes use of humour to cope with such occasions, one can scale back these unwelcome feelings (Gibson, 2019). In different phrases, ‘coping humour can moderate the relationship between stress and negative moods’ (Gibson, 2019, p.157). Similarly, on a extra sensible notice, humour is probably a helpful coping instrument for the easy purpose that it isn’t straightforward to really feel blissful and unhappy concurrently (Gibson, 2019). Martin & Lefcourt (1983) additionally studied whether or not partaking in coping humour (as categorised on their Coping Humour Scale) allowed folks to flee these common feelings. For occasion, their examine established that when antagonistic life occasions akin to shedding a beloved one or job arose for people, these with excessive CHS scores exhibited decrease unfavorable moods than these with low CHS scores. Given that such feelings are unhealthy when skilled chronically, these outcomes may counsel that some type of humour in occasions of hardship is value implementing in a single’s life.

Moreover, Yim (2016) spoke of right now’s elevated stress ranges induced by more durable competitors and socioeconomic stressors. The creator insists that such stress is detrimental to 1’s psychological well being, resulting in melancholy and decrease dwelling requirements whereas concurrently impacting one’s vanity (Yim, 2016). Further, in episodes of endogenous melancholy, he states how laughter can positively alter dopamine and serotonin ranges within the mind. This has noteworthy implications for the organic origins of melancholy the place ‘neurotransmitters in the brain, such as norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin’ are impaired. In different phrases, ‘there is something wrong in the mood control circuit of the brain’ (Yim, 2016, p.247).

Adaptive and maladaptive humour types

Although humour seems to be a big coping machine for stress, it may not be an excellent technique if it serves a dysfunctional function (Abel, 2002). For occasion, humour that’s excessively self-deprecating or employed for self-protection and evasion functions could also be linked to much less efficient coping strategies (Gibson, 2019). In distinction, humour that permits for objectivity and a detachment between oneself and the issue could also be beneficial to coping (Martin, 2001; May, 2009; Perchtold et al., 2019). For this purpose, just a few authors (Kuiper & Leite, 2010; Leist & Müller, 2012; Martin et al., 2003) have analysed 4 humour types that mirror methods people frequently use humour of their lives. Two are understood to be ‘adaptive or advantageous for personal wellbeing (self-enhancing humour) or interpersonal relationships (affiliative humour), and the other two maladaptive or disadvantageous to personal wellbeing (self-defeating humour) or interpersonal relationships (aggressive humour)’ (Martin & Ford, 2007, p.241). These findings counsel a shopper’s fashion and why they use humour to be necessary in lots of interpersonal issues. Hence, it will be sensible for therapists to differentiate between probably adaptive and maladaptive humour types in humorous interactions with shoppers.

Moreover, Saxon et al. (2016) carried out a examine on gender variations that implies women and men observe humour otherwise. While women and men used humour to manage in equal measures, males voiced their feelings by means of humour, whereas ladies carried out humour to amass emotional backing. Though such findings could also be helpful to remember whereas working with each sexes, one have to be cautious to not extrapolate these outcomes past this one examine.

Furthermore, given the seemingly rising use of humour in remedy by practitioners, the creator believes the connection between humour and wellbeing must be examined additional. In different phrases, the present literature is inconclusive as as to if a powerful sense of humour promotes enhanced coping and higher emotional wellbeing or whether or not an ideal sense of humour is the product of wholesome vanity and resourceful coping expertise (Martin & Ford, 2007). Lastly, humour undeniably offers sturdy assist towards the antagonistic results of stress and unfavorable moods akin to melancholy and nervousness. That mentioned, one could be misguided to presume that each one shoppers require is humour to handle these signs, and all will likely be good. In different phrases, extra analysis is required to conclude whether or not humour is superior to different sorts of stress relievers. On the opposite hand, people typically come to counseling to enhance wellbeing and relieve stress of some variety. Thus, it will be prudent for each therapists and shoppers alike to ponder using humour, given the qualities talked about above on this chapter.


In conclusion, humour is an integral element of social interplay that presents a variety of emotional benefits to a person’s well-being. Many people come to remedy with the burden of extreme psychological well being points that have to be addressed. Thus, humour has the potential to speed up the therapy course of to a big diploma. For occasion, it could actually considerably contribute to the working mechanisms concerned in extreme circumstances of hysteria, melancholy, and stress. As such, Sigmund Freud acknowledged the therapeutic potential of humour in lowering rigidity (Connor et al., 2019). Proponents of the Cognitive-Behavioural Perspective additionally state that issues shouldn’t be taken too significantly whereas acknowledging that using humour can’t be extreme. Lastly, the Humanistic perspective considers therapeutic humour to correspond to client-centred concepts. Therefore, this method is underpinned by appreciable theoretical background.

Humour additionally allows shoppers to achieve a brand new perspective on their issues, guiding them by means of darkish factors of their lives towards readjustment and therapeutic. In this manner, it could actually assist people stay hopeful and direct consideration to extra constructive, light-hearted facets of life. Moreover, leaders within the psychotherapy area state that humour positively impacts each events’ therapeutic course of, because it allows improved evaluation of shoppers’ character, which, in flip, results in extra particular counselling methods (Haig, 1986; Martin & Ford, 2007). Conversely, the dangers inherent within the inappropriate use of this instrument also needs to be thought of. To this finish, the idea of therapeutic humour has a variety of opponents who criticize it for missing professionalism. According to such authors, humourous change will not be appropriate for discussing severe issues, akin to psychological well being and associated points (Goldin et al., 2006). That mentioned, there’s a high-quality line between constructive, therapy-progressing humour and inappropriate mockery. The therapist’s stage of proficiency, amongst different expertise, entails with the ability to differentiate between these two ideas to be able to implement humour successfully. Therefore, this instrument must be seen as one other therapeutic method, which is, whereas useful, not universally relevant. Finally, humour unlocks new alternatives in remedy by offering therapists with a instrument of immense potential. If a therapist can undertake humour judiciously, its constructive results will quickly change into evident. People naturally need laughter and positivity, and astute therapists should benefit from this concept in remedy. As Rufus Wainwright as soon as mentioned, ‘There’s no life with out humour. It could make the fantastic moments of life actually wonderful, and it could actually make tragic moments bearable’.


Abel, M. (1998). Interaction of Humor and Gender in Moderating Relationships Between Stress and Outcomes. The Journal Of Psychology, 132(3), 267-276.

Abel, M. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping methods. Humor – International Journal Of Humor Research, 15(4).

Abel, M., & Maxwell, D. (2002). Humor and Affective Consequences of a Stressful Task. Journal Of Social And Clinical Psychology, 21(2), 165-190.

Akram, U., Drabble, J., Cau, G., Hershaw, F., Rajenthran, A., & Lowe, M. et al. (2020). Exploratory examine on the position of emotion regulation in perceived valence, humour, and helpful use of depressive web memes in melancholy. Scientific Reports, 10(1).

Association for Applied and Therapeutic Humor. (2021). Web.

Boag, S. (2014). Ego, drives, and the dynamics of inner objects. Frontiers In Psychology, 5.

Boyle, G., & Joss-Reid, J. (2004). Relationship of humour to well being: A psychometric investigation. British Journal Of Health Psychology, 9, 51–66.

Brooks, A., Herrmann, P., & Andreas, S. (2020). The use of banter in psychotherapy: A scientific literature evaluation. Counselling And Psychotherapy Research.

Cann, A., & Collette, C. (2014). Sense of Humor, Stable Affect, and Psychological Well-Being. Europe’s Journal Of Psychology, 10(3), 464-479.

Cann, A., Calhoun, L., & Nance, J. (2000). Exposure to humor earlier than and after an disagreeable stimulus: Humor as a preventative or a remedy. Humor – International Journal Of Humor Research, 13(2).

Cheng, D., & Wang, L. (2014). Examining the Energizing Effects of Humor: The Influence of Humor on Persistence Behavior. Journal Of Business And Psychology, 30(4), 759-772.

Christoff, M., & Dauphin, B. (2020). Freud’s Theory of Humor. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing.

Connor, D., Newcorn, J., Saylor, Ok., Amann, B., Scahill, L., & Robb, A. et al. (2019). Maladaptive Aggression: With a Focus on Impulsive Aggression in Children and Adolescents. Journal Of Child And Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 29(8), 576-591.

Conversano, C., Rotondo, A., Lensi, E., Vista, O., Arpone, F., & Reda, M. (2010). Optimism and Its Impact on Mental and Physical Well-Being. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology In Mental Health, 1(1), 25-29.

Cooper, M. (2008). Essential analysis findings in counselling and psychotherapy (1st ed.). SAGE.

Corey, G. (2013). Theory and observe of counseling and psychotherapy (ninth ed.). Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

Crawford, S., & Caltabiano, N. (2011). Promoting emotional well-being by means of using humour. The Journal Of Positive Psychology, 6(3), 237-252.

Digney, J. (2014). The Therapeutic Applications of Humour [Ebook]. The CYC-Net Press. Web.

Dionigi, A., & Canestrari, C. (2018). The use of humor by therapists and shoppers in cognitive remedy. The European Journal Of Humour Research, 6(3), 50.

Dryden, W., & Branch, R. (2008). The Cognitive Behaviour Counselling Primer. PCCS Books.

Dziegielewski, S., Jacinto, G., Laudadio, A., & Legg-Rodriguez, L. (2003). Humor: An Essential Communication Tool in Therapy. International Journal Of Mental Health, 32(3), 74-90.

Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (2007). The Practice of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (2nd ed.). Springer Pub. Co.

Ellis, A., & Miller, A. (2012). Instructor’s Manual for Albert Ellis on REBT [Ebook]. Psychotherapy.web. Web.

Evans, T. (2015). Counselling expertise for changing into a wiser practitioner. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Ferguson, M., & Ford, T. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identification theories. Humor – International Journal Of Humor Research, 21(3).

Frankl, V. (1975). Paradoxical intention and dereflection. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 12(3), 226-237.

Franzini, L. (2001). Humor in Therapy: The Case for Training Therapists in its Uses and Risks. The Journal Of General Psychology, 128(2), 170-193.

Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Gibson, J. (2019). An introduction to the psychology of humor (1st ed.). Routledge.

Goldin, E., & Bordan, T. (1999). The Use of Humor in Counseling: The Laughing Cure. Journal Of Counseling & Development, 77(4), 405-410.

Goldin, E., Bordan, T., Araoz, D., Gladding, S., Kaplan, D., Krumholtz, J., & Lazarus, A. (2006). Humor in Counseling: Leader Perspectives. Journal Of Counseling & Development, 84(4), 397-404.

Haig, R. (1986). Therapeutic Uses of Humor. American Journal Of Psychotherapy, 40(4), 543-553.

Hassanzadeh, A., Heidari, Z., Feizi, A., Hassanzadeh Keshteli, A., Roohafza, H., Afshar, H., & Adibi, P. (2017). Association of Stressful Life Events with Psychological Problems: A Large-Scale Community-Based Study Using Grouped Outcomes Latent Factor Regression with Latent Predictors. Computational And Mathematical Methods In Medicine, 2017, 1-12.

Kemp, N. (2015). What Is Provocative Therapy?. Web.

Kuiper, N., & Leite, C. (2010). Personality impressions related to 4 distinct humor types. Scandinavian Journal Of Psychology, 51(2), 115-122.

Leist, A., & Müller, D. (2012). Humor Types Show Different Patterns of Self-Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Well-Being. Journal Of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 551-569.

Mallett, R., Ford, T., & Woodzicka, J. (2016). What Did He Mean by that? Humor Decreases Attributions of Sexism and Confrontation of Sexist Jokes. Sex Roles, 75(5-6), 272-284.

Maples, M., Dupey, P., Torres-Rivera, E., Phan, L., Vereen, L., & Garrett, M. (2001). Ethnic Diversity and the Use of Humor in Counseling: Appropriate or Inappropriate?. Journal Of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 53-60.

Martin, R. (2001). Humor, laughter, and bodily well being: Methodological points and analysis findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504-519.

Martin, R., & Ford, T. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative method (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

Martin, R., & Lefcourt, H. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324.

Martin, R., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, Ok. (2003). Individual variations in makes use of of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal Of Research In Personality, 37(1), 48-75.

May, R. (2009). Man’s seek for himself. W. W. Norton & Company.

Morgan, J., Smith, R., & Singh, A. (2019). Exploring the position of humor within the administration of existential nervousness. HUMOR, 32(3), 433-448.

Mosak, H. (1987). Ha ha and aha: The position of humour In psychotherapy (1st ed.). Routledge.

Perchtold, C., Weiss, E., Rominger, C., Feyaerts, Ok., Ruch, W., Fink, A., & Papousek, I. (2019). Humorous cognitive reappraisal: More benign humour and fewer “dark” humour is affiliated with extra adaptive cognitive reappraisal methods. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0211618.

Prerost, F. (1984). Evaluating the systematic use of humor in psychotherapy with adolescents. Journal Of Adolescence, 7(3), 267-276.

Psychotherapy.web. (2012). Albert Ellis video on REBT [Video]. Web.

Richman, J. (1996). Jokes as a Projective Technique: The Humor of Psychiatric Patients. American Journal Of Psychotherapy, 50(3), 336-346.

Rutherford, Ok. (1994). Humor in psychotherapy. Individual Psychology, 50(2), 205-222.

Samson, A., & Gross, J. (2012). Humour as emotion regulation: The differential penalties of unfavorable versus constructive humour. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 375-384.

Saper, B. (1987). Humor in psychotherapy: Is it good or dangerous for the shopper?. Professional Psychology: Research And Practice, 18(4), 360-367.

Saxon, L., Makhashvili, N., Chikovani, I., Seguin, M., McKee, M., & Patel, V. et al. (2016). Coping methods and psychological well being outcomes of conflict-affected individuals within the Republic of Georgia. Epidemiology And Psychiatric Sciences, 26(3), 276-286.

Shaughnessy, M., & Wadsworth, T. (1992). Humor in Counseling and Psychotherapy: A 20-Year Retrospective. Psychological Reports, 70(3), 755-762.

Sultanoff, S. (2013). Integrating humor into psychotherapy: Research, concept, and the mandatory circumstances for the presence of therapeutic humor in serving to relationships. The Humanistic Psychologist, 41(4), 388-399.

Swaminath, G. (2006). ′Joke′s A Part′: In defence of humour. Indian Journal Of Psychiatry, 48(3), 177.

Tugade, M., Fredrickson, B., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2004). Psychological Resilience and Positive Emotional Granularity: Examining the Benefits of Positive Emotions on Coping and Health. Journal Of Personality, 72(6), 1161-1190.

Yim, J. (2016). Therapeutic Benefits of Laughter in Mental Health: A Theoretical Review. The Tohoku Journal Of Experimental Medicine, 239(3), 243-249.

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Order a Paper Now