The Concept of Solution Focused Therapy Presentation

Foundations of the SBA idea: Pre-(to) Mid twentieth century

Psychotherapy perceived as a discussion board throughout which the therapist deciphered a consumer’s drawback after which proceeded to resolve it with professional psychological theories and talent.

We will write a customized Presentation on The Concept of Solution Focused Therapy particularly for you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page

807 licensed writers on-line

Learn More

Emphasis was laid on the issue and the causes, which have been believed to stem from troubled childhoods and so the affected person saved them within the deep recesses of his or her psyche. This idea knowledgeable many of the therapy procedures aimed toward retrieving ideas from the sub-conscious e.g. hypnosis, dream evaluation and interpretation, medicine and different projective strategies.

Therapy was normally lengthy and unfocussed in that it lacked pragmatism and particular targets. Patients went for remedy for many years with out noticing any main developments partly as a result of they didn’t know what enhancements to look out for.

In this period, the dominant psycho-therapeutic process was that which was established by Sigmund Freud that divided the thoughts into three elements, the acutely aware, the unconscious and the ego.

The ideas believed to trigger psychological points resided within the unconscious and one of the best ways to retrieve these was by guaranteeing the topic was unconscious then the therapist would faucet into their thoughts utilizing numerous extraction strategies together with hypnosis and dream harvesting.

Foundations: Middle of twentieth century and past

Therapists and sufferers alike quickly started to hunt higher methods of issuing and accessing remedy that was temporary, goal-oriented and pragmatic.

Behaviorism took root because it was distinguished from psychoanalysis because it emphasised on intervening in concrete observable behaviors.

Get your 100% authentic paper on any subject finished
in as little as 3 hours
Learn More

Albert Ellis founding father of the extra pragmatic Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) postulated that psychological issues have been brought on by irrational beliefs held by sufferers and if these beliefs could possibly be recognized and discarded and changed with extra rational ones, the issue could be solved.

William James (1842-1910) is named the daddy of pragmatism. He believed that individuals are creators of actuality and that if therapists stopped specializing in explaining and predicting reality and as a substitute targeted on figuring out what works, they might be approach forward.

It quickly grew to become obvious that these strategies have been ineffective particularly as a result of sufferers have been subjected to years of remedy with none seen therapeutic going down. The sufferers themselves started to discredit the psychotherapy and people who have been determined realized learn how to ‘be’ their prognosis: in order that it seems that therapy halted upon institution of the issue. Nevertheless, this ‘problem-identification’ is doubtful at finest as a result of it was established on the idea that each one issues stemmed from disturbed childhoods. The idea didn’t contemplate that maybe the issues have been merely manifestations of unhealthy behaviors presently.

Behaviorism got here as a neo-solution and it made psycho-therapists severely contemplate sufferers’ behavioral patterns together with the thought processes that have been faulty to their psychological well being.

Foundations: Genesis of the Solution Based Therapy

Milton Erickson: an unorthodox therapist whose concepts have been very profitable in his period. He believed that folks may resolve their very own issues and inspired sufferers to look to their social sources for options. He de-emphasized prognosis of issues and as a substitute capitalized on the anticipated answer. He famous that half his sufferers had already started fixing the issue once they got here in for remedy.

This was a radical as a result of he went utterly towards the grain and steered that folks have been wired to resolve their very own issues. Traditional psychologists opposed him, not solely as a result of he precipitated them to lose purchasers but additionally as a result of his concepts had advantage however they lucked theoretical backing.

Insoo Kim Berg and de Shazer

  • One-way display: this was initially de Shazer’s mission whereby he (or a group of therapists) noticed the affected person with the therapist in dialog with out the discover of both occasion. After a while, the therapist got here behind the display and the tip gave pointers and observations which the therapist went again to relay to the affected person as suggestions.
  • Ethical Dilemma: the shortage of confidentiality attribute of this follow precipitated lots of upheavals from conventional therapists and ultimately Berg and de Shazer broke off to begin their very own practice-The Brief Family Therapy Center (BFTC) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1978.
  • Mental Research Institute (MRI): Inspired by the controversial works of those psychologists, Berg joined the Mental Research Institute for additional research and Weakland grew to become her mentor. Co-incidentally, Weakland’s mentor was de Shazer and ultimately, Berg and de Shazer have been launched and so they began working collectively.

In a approach, this was a improvement of Erickson’s idea. Erickson had been worn out in his period however right here have been psychotherapists reviving his idea albeit posthumously. What is fascinating is that the motives at each instances have been totally different, with Berg trying to discover a working answer that required solely temporary remedy. However, it’s also fascinating to notice that De Shazer’s motives weren’t married to Berg’s on the time. If something, he was not essentially contemplating psychotherapy whereas engaged on George Bateson’s mission, which is one which gave lots of perception to the Solution Focused Approach to remedy. Anyhow, ultimately there was a gathering of minds as to the specified consequence which was to search out out what works in psychotherapy.

We will write a customized Presentation on The Concept of Solution Focused Therapy particularly for you!
Get your first paper with 15% OFF
Learn More

Coming to the idea

Insoo Kim Berg: an American therapist with Asian origin. Asia is a collectivist continent therefore diverting from the accepted aim dictated by household and group was precarious. However, Insoo felt that conventional therapeutic approaches weren’t working and dared to go towards the grain. She was additional impressed by Jay Haley’s texts, specifically: “The power tactics of Jesus Christ” and “Uncommon therapy” amongst others. At the time, Haley was working on the Mental Research Institute with different well-known suppose tanks like John Weakland and Paul Watzlawick.

Initially, the creators of SBA didn’t have a working speculation as a result of they needed to determine what works in remedy from scratch and never construct on present conventional approaches that have been proving ineffective.

An in depth have a look at Hofstede’s idea on tradition displays the traits of a collectivist tradition, which Berg hailed from. Such a perspective assists us in understanding the cultural obstacles she should have confronted when she dared to defy what has come to be established as custom in psychotherapy. What she was in truth doing was foregoing the curiosity of the bulk psychotherapists to pursue an untraveled terrain whose propositions on the time have been nothing wanting prop estrous! However, she was sensible about it particularly as a result of they didn’t pinpoint a selected idea on the onset. Looking at answer targeted remedy presently, this knowledge is obvious as a result of it’s principally a risky follow which relies on the affected person in entrance of you and their perspective of actuality.

Main beliefs

  1. If it’s not broke [in the patient’s mind] don’t repair it- this encourages non intrusion or non-interference by the therapist on issues not associated to the issue at hand.
  2. Once you realize what works, do extra of it.
  3. If one thing doesn’t work, don’t do it once more, do one thing different- SFT is basically experimental and therein lies its magnificence as a result of the actual fact is, every affected person is exclusive and what works for affected person A is not going to essentially work for affected person B. consequently, therapists must be prepared attempt to fail severally earlier than they discover a working answer for every affected person.
  4. Start with the top in mind- this touches on aim setting on the onset in order that each therapist and affected person are conscious of the specified consequence and work in the direction of it together with intermittent evaluations.

It is obvious from the onset that this strategy lays emphasis on the affected person and their wants. The experience of the therapist takes a backseat because the affected person is given the chance to relay the issue as she or he perceives it.

It can also be largely experimental as a result of what works for one affected person is not going to essentially work for an additional (Dejong & Berg, 1998, p.221).

Finally, the specified consequence is what guides the process of therapy. This is as a result of even when one appears to be like on the name- Solution-Focused strategy, the answer is what is important to each affected person and therapist.

  1. The affected person in a remedy session will not be against the thought of receiving assist to succeed in an answer and so the alleged resentment that conventional therapists believed existed and acted accordingly is to be distributed with.
  2. The emphasis must be on the consumer and his life. The consumer ought to do many of the speaking in any given session as a result of she or he is conscious of the issue, the trigger and potential options, the therapist’s function is solely to direct the affected person.
  3. A concentrate on the issue and its trigger is unproductive as a result of we can not change the previous. Instead, therapists ought to steer sufferers’ focus away from the issue and onto potential perceptible options.

This strategy frowns upon the normal perspective of sufferers resenting remedy and thereby resisting therapy. Instead, it postulates that the affected person typically has acknowledged an issue and when she or he makes an appointment with the therapist, it’s as a result of she or he is in search of an answer to the conundrum. Seen towards this background, the affected person is a really cooperative occasion within the therapy course of who can really be relied upon to provide you with significant ideas particularly when it comes to exceptions.

Secondly, the idea of this strategy is the character of change, which is fixed and is led to by the passage of time. As such, the therapist makes the affected person perceive that the previous is everlasting and can’t be modified and it’s far wiser and more practical to concentrate on bettering the longer term. This signifies that the main focus is on options and never on the issue.

Not certain should you can write a paper on The Concept of Solution Focused Therapy by your self? We might help you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page
Learn More

  1. The therapist can not on his personal provide you with a viable answer, the affected person has to reach at answer utilizing the map given to him by the therapist and social sources accessible to them.
  2. It will not be superb to time the lasting interval of remedy i.e. this strategy prefers a quick remedy and so it doesn’t prescribe the variety of classes. Instead, the affected person and therapist set targets primarily based on desired outcomes or options relatively than time.
  3. Pre-session change two thirds of the sufferers that see counseling or remedy have already started to resolve the issue on their very own earlier than they attend their first appointments. It is necessary to seize the change they’ve achieved unselfconsciously an use it to set off or encourage future change.

This pre-session change serves to construct upon Erickson’s assertions that individuals are constructed to resolve their very own issues. It can also be obvious within the identification of exceptions because the affected person will ear-mark durations when the issue appeared much less intense as a result of they have been coping properly. The therapist solely serves to spotlight such breakthroughs after which coach the affected person to make them a behavior and thus the issue recedes.

Development of SBT: 1978-1985

These years marked the creation of the idea of the answer primarily based strategy to remedy.

Financial hardships and guiding goal: at this level, Berg and De Shazer barely had sufficient cash to help themselves and their lounge sufficed for an workplace. Their foremost goal was to discover out what labored in remedy.

De Shazer’s publications

Patterns of Brief Family Therapy: An Ecosystemic Approach – ebook revealed in 1982.

The Death of Resistance (De Shazer, 1984) first revealed in 1979 however rejected by journals 17 instances: this text rejected the concept that sufferers secretly resent remedy and strengthened the notion that they search remedy in a bid to cooperate with the therapist to find an answer for his or her issues.

Just like Erickson earlier than them, Berg and De Shazer skilled seemingly insurmountable difficulties convincing their colleague elites that that they had a greater method to conduct remedy. The conventional strategy was set in stone and breaching it made them culpable for theoretic crime. They have been shunned and De Shazer’s first publication took 5 years and seventeen makes an attempt to get revealed in a peer reviewed journal, and even then, it was taken with a pinch of salt.

Techniques utilized in Solution Based Therapy

  • Four helpful interventions in temporary remedy, which he co-authored with Alex Molnar in 1984- this text launched the First Session Formula Task which entails therapists asking sufferers to go dwelling and analyze the great issues occurring of their lives that they wish to proceed occurring.= the continuation query.
  • A second intervention mentioned on this article was “Do something different” based upon behaviorism ideas of George Bateson. This inspired sufferers to alter the way in which they acted and look out for higher outcomes.
  • A 3rd intervention approach was the “overcoming-the-urge task”, which required sufferers to concentrate to how they managed to curb an act they have been complaining about.

These preliminary publications are important for the muse they set for what got here to be often known as the Solution targeted strategy to remedy. Presently, they inform the scientific steps undertaken within the execution of this type of remedy.

  • The stability as change intervention which was motivational the place a affected person felt that they have been caught in the identical scenario. The therapist famous that it required myriad abilities to stay steady and quite a few individuals would have fallen again already.
  • Keys to Solution in Brief Therapy was De Shazer’s second ebook and in it he emphasizes the necessity to develop accustomed to alter; the unimportance of dwelling on issues in making an attempt to resolve them; and the importance of previous successes as a key to fixing current issues.
  • An oblique strategy to temporary remedy, a chapter within the ebook launched the idea of “scaling questions”, an intervention approach that requires the consumer to grade himself on a scale of 0-10 when it comes to the perfect scenario when the issue is solved and the present place

These preliminary publications are important for the muse they set for what got here to be often known as the Solution targeted strategy to remedy. Presently, they inform the scientific steps undertaken within the execution of this type of remedy (De Shazer, 1991, p. 431).

  • Scaling questions additionally contact on the peaks achieved by the consumer prior to now in case the issue is brought on by a relapse. The consumer is required to look at how his scenario was on the time of such a peak and determine potential options to the present drawback.
  • Between 1986 and 1987, the “What’s Better?” query took root. It was requested on the onset of the second and later classes and it gave the purchasers an opportunity to focus fully on the constructive aspects of their life and really feel motivated by way of this constructive evaluation.
  • The idea of Exceptions took root when the therapists found that drawback depth tended to fluctuate and that at instances it was extreme whereas different instances it was not as pronounced. They thus inspired sufferers to be aware of the scenario together with their actins in the course of the much less extreme instances and check out repeat these circumstances in a bid to scale back the depth of the issue and have it fade to the background.

These preliminary publications are important for the muse they set for what got here to be often known as the Solution targeted strategy to remedy. Presently, they inform the scientific steps undertaken within the execution of this type of remedy.

Scaling is now used even past psychological circles, so is the miracle query.

  • The Miracle Question invented by Insoo Kim Berg is a very fashionable intervention approach that requires the affected person to think about that within the lifeless of the evening a miracle occurred and the issue magically vanished then inform the therapist what could be totally different.
  • In Clues, Investigating Solutions in Brief Therapy, 1988 De Shazer launched the idea of prediction duties that required sufferers to foretell what they thought they might accomplish the subsequent day concerning their present drawback. This idea relies on the concept that setting out a plan to resolve the issue is fixing it midway.
  • Reframing: this entails reverting damaging and constructive views of a disaster in order that as a substitute of an issue as purely damaging, one appears to be like on the good intentions and doubtless genius talent invested therein.

Reframing is also called restructuring and its genius is within the creation of a non-prejudicial ambiance that’s each obligatory and conducive for goal remedy (Guterman, 2010, p.67).

Classification of purchasers

  • Visitors: these are they that should not have clear expectations from the remedy program. They are principally there involuntarily advert they don’t imagine the classes will work. At instances they don’t even appear to know their drawback.
  • Complainers : these are they which have reckless conduct and are lazy in arising with options. They get pleasure from speaking to the therapist to enumerate their issues and search pity however retract when the therapist means that they work in the direction of a selected answer. They appear blind to the cause-effect relationship between their conduct and the issue and as such can not even start to think about how their conduct is related to the answer.
  • Customers: the perfect sufferers that perceive why they’re in remedy. Co-operate with therapists to search out and check out options whereas reporting again on their effectiveness.

The concept is to have the therapist convert a affected person from a customer to a complainer nd ultimately to a buyer.

Clinical steps for SFT: Step 1- Problem and Goal

Co-constructing a Problem and Goal

The drawback definition ought to match the affected person’s worldviews. The therapist must be cautious to not “create a problem” the place the consumer doesn’t envisage one. The therapist ought to take care to not impose pathological issues on the consumer the place they don’t exist.

Ideal questions:

  • What is your understanding of what brings you right here at present? (for drawback identification)
  • What would you want to perform by way of remedy? (for targets)

The subject of world views can’t be overemphasized as there are two contrasting views of realities at play: the affected person’s and the therapist’s. this strategy provides credence to the previous over the latter by making use of the “not knowing” mentality to the therapist that requires her or him to imagine the affected person is aware of all of it so far as the scope of the issue is anxious, therefore the initiating query: “What is your understanding of what brings you here today?” this offers the affected person and therapist an opportunity to derive optimum outcomes from the classes.

Step 2: Exceptions

Identifying and Amplifying Exception

Question:When has there been a time when you coped better with the problem?

The impact of this query is to have the affected person look again at instances when the issue didn’t appear so extreme and mirror again on how they have been coping on the time. The concept is that issues are all the time fluctuating and at instances they’re extra extreme whereas at different instances they don’t seem to be so severe. A information of earlier coping abilities might help to find an answer quicker.

Exceptions are these ups in the issue’s lifespan the place the affected person can acknowledge having gained some leverage over the problems they have been dealing with. By capitulating on these, they’ll type by way of conjoined exceptions a strong answer as they follow healing exceptions over time.

Step 3: Assigning Tasks

  • This step goals at constructing on the issues, targets, exceptions, and potential exceptions established within the earlier classes.
  • The concept is that the therapist assign the duty requiring sensible effort relying on the affected person’s solutions beforehand.
  • If the affected person recognized exceptions, the therapist can provide a process to proceed to follow the exception and report again on a scaling degree.
  • It is necessary that the duty assigned be significant to the affected person or within the affected person’s opinion in view of fixing the issue and attaining the specified finish.

It is necessary that the duty assigned be significant to the affected person or within the affected person’s opinion in view of fixing the issue and attaining the specified finish.

Step 4: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tasks

  • Involves the identification and amplification of exceptions established by way of the duties assigned within the earlier classes.
  • In case of damaging suggestions corresponding to a consumer reporting that he didn’t do the duty, the therapist ought to keep away from the resistance by letting that slide after which in all probability going again to the place to begin of the earlier session. At instances such damaging suggestions is insightful to the therapist as a result of it signifies that the consumer was not intrigued by that sort of process and a reassessment is important.
  • For {couples} and households, this session is marked by a re-focus o the issue. The therapist ought to rigorously steer the affected person (s) away from the issue and ask to deal with the duty assigned on the final session then later re-evaluate the issues and targets.

At instances such damaging suggestions is insightful to the therapist as a result of it signifies that the consumer was not intrigued by that sort of process and a reassessment is important.

Step 5: Reevaluating the Problem and Goal

  • At this level, the therapist and his/her affected person re-evaluate the issue and aim.
  • The concept is to see how a lot the exceptions are panning out as ample options to the issue, or how a lot they’ve been instrumental in attaining the specified outcomes.
  • If the answer is passable, the remedy ends right here. If not, the issue and targets are reconstructed and remedy begins once more.

The concept is to see how a lot the exceptions are panning out as ample options to the issue, or how a lot they’ve been instrumental in attaining the specified outcomes.

Other authors’ contributions to the idea

Eve Lipchik got here up with two key ideas:

  • The coping query – “How do you manage to go on?” this helps when the affected person is feeling notably despondent and maybe charges themselves at zero on the dimensions.
  • Listening with a constructive ear – associated to De Shazer’s Death of Resistance Idea and it requires the therapist to undertake an appreciative palate on which to obtain info and at instances, this implies wanting on the good intentions that resulted in unhealthy conditions.

Harlene Anderson and Harry Goolishian (1992) formally launched the concept that a therapist ought to hearken to the affected person with an perspective of “not-knowing” versus being an professional in that subject.

Eve Lipchik got here up with two key ideas viz. the coping query and listening with a constructive ear (DE Shazer, Berg, & Lipchik, 1986, p. 209). However, Harlene Anderson and Harry Goolishian formally launched the concept that a therapist ought to hearken to the affected person with an perspective of “not-knowing” versus being an professional in that subject.

Strengths of the idea

Flexibility permits progress of idea and therapist in scope and information respectively:

  • Since this idea may be very basic in its scope and the guideline is that the therapist ought to observe every particular person affected person to decipher what works and what doesn’t, it provides room for potential progress of the idea and the realm of psychology.
  • Additionally, it permits particular person therapists to develop of their skilled capacities as they uncover latent concepts whereas visiting with sufferers.

Ignorance of therapist encourages disclosure and optimum options:

  • Since the therapist is required to undertake a “not knowing” perspective, he’s much less biased t the affected person’s dilemma and thus much less prone to impose upon the affected person pathological issues. This enhances sufferers’ confidence and stimulates full disclosure resulting in optimum options.

Additionally, it permits particular person therapists to develop of their skilled capacities as they uncover latent concepts whereas visiting with sufferers.

Self-initiative of consumer and respect of consumer’s psychological state (if it’s not broke [in the client’s mind] don’t repair it).

Specificity in aim formation the authors of this idea have provide you with a really particular mannequin for aim formation that in flip churns out particular targets which are related to the issue, measurable, attainable, lifelike and time-bound.

Brevity and precision:

  • The foremost concept is that this strategy be pragmatic and ship outcomes inside a short while. This is why it has 5 temporary and relatively easy steps which may simply be accomplished inside a month or much less and rewound with none actual hurt.

The Solution targeted strategy is famed for its brevity. It is necessary to differentiate this function from the time period short- time period as a result of the latter depicts a component of timing that’s principally absent from the answer primarily based strategy, whose definitive function is the emphasis on answer relatively than interval of remedy.

Additionally, the idea of not guessing the affected person’s drawback involves thoughts stemming from the qualification “in the client’s mind.” this denotes a bent to let the affected person spell out the issue as they understand it.

Weaknesses

  • Novelty: this methodology of remedy remains to be in its childhood and as such, it has not been weathered over time by analysis and expertise. This novel standing considerably removes from its credibility.
  • Lack of detailed analysis evaluating it to different fashions makes utilizing t as a complement or complement troublesome
  • Relativity of ‘reality’ creates a barrier between the therapist and the affected person’s understanding of the issue and perceived answer resulting from distinction in world views.

The formal time period answer targeted strategy finds its genesis within the nineteen eighties. As such, it’s a most lower than half a century previous and this makes it much less credible than the centuries-old conventional strategy. As such, convincing the world of its credibility regardless of the shortage of exhaustive analysis and theories is a taxing process.

Secondly, the difficulty of world views can’t be overemphasized as there are two contrasting views of realities at play: the affected person’s and the therapist’s. this strategy provides credence to the previous over the latter by making use of the “not knowing” mentality to the therapist that requires her or him to imagine the affected person is aware of all of it so far as the scope of the issue is anxious, therefore the initiating query: “What is your understanding of what brings you here today?” this offers the affected person and therapist an opportunity to derive optimum outcomes from the classes.

Summary

  • The answer targeted strategy to remedy is enticing resulting from its brevity, precision, and pragmatism. The foremost builders of this college of thought are Insoo Kim Berg and Steve de Shazer.
  • Its emphasis is on the answer and the longer term as a substitute of the issue causes which are current prior to now. However, it advocates for a evaluation of the previous to determine exceptions, that are outlined as cut-off date when the issue was not so pronounced resulting from a selected coping mechanism by the affected person.
  • These exceptions type the constructing blocks of the duties assigned by the therapist to the affected person with a view of attaining the specified outcomes.
  • It remains to be a brand new subject of psychoanalysis.

The answer targeted strategy to remedy is enticing resulting from its brevity, precision, and pragmatism. The foremost builders of this college of thought are Insoo Kim Berg and Steve de Shazer. Its emphasis is on the answer and the longer term as a substitute of the issue causes which are current prior to now. However, it advocates for a evaluation of the previous to determine exceptions, that are outlined as cut-off date when the issue was not so pronounced resulting from a selected coping mechanism by the affected person. These exceptions type the constructing blocks of the duties assigned by the therapist to the affected person with a view of attaining the specified outcomes.

References

DeJong, P., & Berg, I. (1998). Interviewing for Solutions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

De Shazer, S. (1991). Putting distinction to work. New York, NY: Norton.

De Shazer, S., Berg, I., & Lipchik, E. (1986). Brief Therapy: Focused Solution Development. Family Process, 25, 207-221.

Guterman, J. (2010). Advanced Techniques For Solution-Focused Counseling. Web.

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Order a Paper Now