The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Research Paper


In at this time’s America, it represents a ordinary observe amongst politicians and authorities officers to say that the functioning of the nation’s legislative department has a strongly outlined moral significance. After all, it doesn’t characterize a lot of a secret that with a purpose to be enacted by the US Congress, nearly each legislative initiative should show probably useful to the society’s ethical well-being. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) illustrates the validity of this suggestion completely nicely. The motive for that is fairly obvious – the precise rationale behind the FCPA’s enactment was the publicly shared perception that when lined by its provisions, American corporations will probably be more likely to use further effort into guaranteeing the moral soundness of their business operations in international nations. Nevertheless, there seems to be far more to the FCPA than merely its presumed capability to make American enterprise executives much less more likely to take into account bribing international officers – it’s there to assist implement America’s geopolitical hegemony. In my paper, I’ll intention to discover the validity of this suggestion, whereas exhibiting that it’s attainable to defend the appropriateness of the SEC ruling in opposition to SAP SE from each: the morally Relativist and morally Realist views.

We will write a customized Research Paper on The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act particularly for you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page

807 licensed writers on-line

Learn More

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)


The FCPA noticed enactment in 1977 because the authorized instrument of restoring public belief within the moral integrity of American corporations working overseas. It accommodates two varieties of legally binding provisions: anti-bribery and accounting. The former is there to stop lined topics from attempting to bribe authorities officers in international nations, because the imply of guaranteeing that their enterprise in these nations stays commercially aggressive (Marks, 2011). According to the Act, it accounts for the criminally/administratively punished offense, on the a part of the US-based/publically traded firm, to “pay money or anything of value to a foreign official or a foreign political party… for the purpose of influencing the official to obtain, retain, or direct business to any person or to secure an improper advantage”. The second kind of provisions, contained within the Act, require ‘issuers’ (publically traded corporations) to make sure the considerate transparency of their bookkeeping insurance policies, “Issuers must make and keep books, records, and accounts which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company”. This, in flip, is meant to assist guarantee that no funds are misused for any unscrupulous functions.

There are two organizations in command of implementing the provisions of the FCPA – the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Whereas the SEC is worried with addressing the Act’s civil accountabilities, the DOJ is in command of urgent felony expenses in opposition to these lined topics that violate the FCPA. According to Choi and Davis (2014), “The maximum criminal penalty for an organization that violates the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA is a fine of up to $2 million. Civil penalties for violations of the anti-bribery provisions are limited to $16,000 per violation. Criminal penalties for violations of the accounting provisions can range up to $25 million” (p. 412). This is meant to function a strong incentive for the US-based business organizations to use a further effort into ensuring that their operations in international nations are performed in an ethically sound approach.

Brief historical past

The foremost driving issue for the adoption of the FCPA served a public scandal that erupted in 1977. At its heart have been the US plane firm Lockheed and the Government of Japan. In this 12 months, it was revealed to the general public that Lockheed used to bribe Japanese governmental officers on a steady foundation, with a purpose to be accepted because the nation’s protection contractor. As the consequence, the Japanese authorities needed to resign. Following this improvement, the US Congress enacted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Yockey, 2013).

Initially, the FCPA’s provisions used to use solely to US-based companies. Nevertheless, as time went on, the Act started to be more and more resorted to because the instrument of implementing the US legislation extraterritorial. Such a improvement was attributable to the truth that for the reason that time of its introduction; the FCPA has been amended twice – in 1988 and 1998. The first of those amendments needed to do with redefining the which means of the notion ‘US-based subject’ to incorporate international corporations registered on the NYSE. Because of what we learn about how the Act was once utilized previously, amongst such corporations might be named Statoil, Siemens, Daimler, BAE Systems, JGC, Tenaris, Pankesh Patel, and Alstom.

The final modification upgraded the FCPA to be seen as nothing wanting de facto worldwide legislation, as a result of since 1988 the involved Act started to use extraterritorially to foreign-based company entities, as a lot because it does to American residents and privately-owned corporations. The official logic behind the FCPA’s modification in 1988 needed to do with the truth that, because it was handed by the Congress in 1977, the Act was inserting American corporations in a deprived place, as in comparison with their rivals from overseas (Barker, Pacini & Sinason, 2012).

The second modification to the FCPA was caused by the truth that in 1998, the US Congress (together with the legislative our bodies of different 34 nations) ratified the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (the so-called OECD Convention). One of the Convention’s provisions confirmed the authorized soundness of the FCPA-induced observe of treating bribery as an ‘extraterritorial crime’ – one thing that resulted in increasing the vary of the Act’s jurisdiction even additional, within the sense of creating the target preconditions for it to be utilized globally. As Sebelius (2008) famous, “The new amendment broadened the reach of potential FCPA bribery violations by expanding the scope of persons covered by the Act to include some foreign nationals… and extended the FCPA’s jurisdiction beyond America’s borders to allow greater enforcement efforts by U.S. prosecutors” (p. 581). Nowadays, increasingly more corporations (particularly foreign-based) discover themselves being accused of violating the FCPA. Whereas, all through the primary three a long time, following the preliminary enactment of the FCPA, the common variety of simultaneous Act-related investigations carried out by the DOJ and SEC in a single 12 months would hardly ever exceed a dozen, from the 12 months 2008 onwards this quantity started to account for no fewer than 100.

Get your 100% authentic paper on any matter accomplished
in as little as 3 hours
Learn More


Even although there are certainly only some doubts that the enactment of the FCPA did contribute in the direction of combating corruption on a worldwide scale, the involved laws continues to be criticized on various totally different accounts. Probably the primary criticism of the FCPA has to do with the truth that regardless of all of its well-meaning goals, the Act represents a violation of worldwide legislation. This merely couldn’t be in any other case. After all, the FCPA gives authorized stipulations for international topics to fall below the jurisdiction of the US legislation, which suggests that the US Government has assumed the powers of the ‘world government’ – fairly opposite to the essential provisions of the UN Charter. As Leibold (2015) identified, “Section 78dd-3 of the FCPA exerts extraterritorial jurisdiction against foreigners, even in cases where there is only a tangential connection between the underlying criminal conduct and the territory of the United States. This kind of exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction fails the balancing test under international law” (p. 263). It is known, after all, that this undermines the Act’s legality slightly considerably – at the very least as it’s being perceived outdoors of the US.

Another main criticism of the FCPA is worried with what many individuals consider accounts for the Act’s ongoing transformation. That is, it now doesn’t fairly serve the operate of guaranteeing that American corporations conduct enterprise in an ethically sound approach. Rather, the FCPA’s continuous enactment permits the US Department of State to impose ‘business tax’ on the entire world. The logic behind this suggestion issues the truth that there’s certainly a great motive to deem the latest functions of the FCPA clearly discriminative as a result of most business entities which were investigated all through the final decade include overwhelmingly foreign-based corporations (Leibold, 2015). This, after all, raises various issues in regards to the laws’s presumed impartiality.

Finally, we are able to point out that the FCPA is strongly ‘Eurocentric’, within the sense of imposing the particularly Western imaginative and prescient of what the time period ‘corruption’ stands for upon the remainder of the world.

Exemplary instances

  1. Siemens. As of this date, essentially the most well-known FCPA investigation concerned the German firm, Siemens. This firm was accused of getting paid a complete of 1.3 billion Euros in bribes to the senior authorities officers all through the world (by means of the years 1999-2006), in trade for with the ability to signal various very worthwhile enterprise offers within the nations of its curiosity. In explicit, Siemens benefited slightly immensely from having ‘greased up’ essentially the most high-ranking members of the Iraqi authorities whereas the UN program “Oil-for-Food” was being applied. In 2008, the US Department of Justice ordered Siemens to pay $800.000 in fines and to offer the assigned impartial auditor with full entry to its company documentation. Moreover, one of many Company’s former administrators was sentenced to serve two years in jail and pay a nice of 108.000 Euros.
  2. Daimler. The DOJ 2010 investigation (below the FCPA) into the ethically questionable (from the American perspective) dealings of the German automaker Daimler proved to be simply as controversial. According to the DOJ representatives, all through the years 1998-2008, Daimler has succeeded in creating an entire system for bribing governmental officers in at least 22 nations. The complete quantity of bribes, paid by this German firm through the time interval in query, has been estimated as excessive as $51 million. To keep away from any additional authorized inquiries and the following courtroom hearings, Daimler agreed to pay $185 million in settlement charges to the American authorities.

Ethical theories

Moral Relativism

The moral principle of ethical Relativism pertains to the philosophical writings of Protagoras, Baruch Spinoza, David Hume, and Friedrich Nietzsche. It is predicated on the belief that there might be no universally acknowledged ethical customary for assessing the moral appropriateness of a specific plan of action, as a result of the moral reasoning of each particular person is extremely subjective, reflecting the innate specifics of his or her ‘brain wiring’. This, in flip, means that the involved psychological processes can’t be subjected to any positivist inquiry. Consequently, they is probably not mentioned outdoors of no matter seems to be the at present prevalent socio-economic/cultural discourse (Tannsjo, 2007). As McDonald (2010) famous, “Proponents of relativism add that the concept of rightness depends on the individual or cultural beliefs and that the ‘rightness’ and ‘wrongness’ are meaningless notions if they are isolated from the specific context within which they have arisen” (p. 448). This, nonetheless, shouldn’t be interpreted because the indication of the speculation’s moral ambivalence. Contrary to what’s generally assumed, the proponents of ethical Relativism don’t deny the likelihood for a specific moral rule/regulation to realize the mainstream standing. In this respect, Hayry (2005) got here up with a wonderfully legitimate commentary, “It (Ethical relativism) does not say that all norms and values should be rejected… In business, ethical relativity often develops into conventional morality and unethical actions are often justified on the ‘commonly accepted practice’ argument” (p. 9). What this normally means is that it’s specifically as much as these in command of shaping the socio-cultural realities in at this time’s world to offer an moral code for outlining the various extent of a specific exercise’s moral soundness. Plainly talking – those that are stronger set ‘moral’ guidelines and implement them upon those that occur to be weaker. Such an thought seems in line with the Darwinian outlook on what accounts for the driving pressure behind the continuing socio-cultural progress – particularly, the unending competitors between totally different nations/societies.


Probably the primary power of the moral principle in query is that, regardless of its affiliation with the ‘survival of the fittest principle, it is value-based to a significantly lesser degree, as compared to the normative models of ethics. This implies that ethical Relativists are naturally predisposed to refrain from assigning any fixed moral value to one’s habits, with out bearing in mind the entire scope of the related exterior circumstances. Consequently, this permits the Relativist ethical judgments to be regularly ‘updated’ – one thing that ensures their continuous applicability.

The principle of ethical Relativism may also be credited for the truth that it’s scientifically reliable, within the sense of emphasizing that the method of passing an ethical judgment on a specific situation can’t be considered such that represents the worth of a ‘thing in itself, unrelated to the affiliated society’s general measure of socio-economic and cultural development. Consequentially, this suggests that to be deemed acceptable, one or one other code of behavioral ethics should be in line with the mentality of these individuals to whom it’s supposed to use. As a preferred saying goes – the reality is with the gang and error with the person.


Among the weaknesses of ethical Relativism might be talked about:

We will write a customized Research Paper on The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act particularly for you!
Get your first paper with 15% OFF
Learn More

  • The proven fact that the involved moral principle fails to offer any virtually helpful definitions for what’s ‘right’ and what’s ‘wrong’, inside the context of how two or extra cultures work together with one another.
  • The principle’s insistence that there are not any basically intrinsic causes for individuals to be prepared to look at the provisions of a specific moral code. What this implies is that the one efficient motivations for an individual to bask in ethically sound habits should be essentially reflective of his or her egocentric agenda – one thing that undermines the validity of the very time period ‘ethics’.

Moral Realism

As of at this time, there isn’t a universally accepted definition as to what the concept of ethical Realism (related to the names of John McDowell, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, and Richard Boyd) stands for. Nevertheless, it’s particularly the definition offered by Delapp (2009), which seems to be essentially the most complete, “Moral realism supports the conjunction of the following three propositions. First, moral statements are truth-apt. Second, at least some moral statements are in fact true. Third, to say that a statement is true is to say that it bears a correspondence to features of the world that exist independently of the evidence or beliefs of anyone or everyone” (p. 2). [Truth-apt are the sentences used to affirm or refute a particular proposition, with respect to the conventions of what Realists refer to as ‘global (universally applicable) ethics’]. The motive for that is that it correlates with the primary conceptual premise of the moral principle in query – individuals’s endowment with the sense of morality is one thing that enables them to be known as people, within the first place. What it means is that morality is a totally goal class. Therefore, the truth that the sense of morals in some people seems slightly weakened can not presumably be known as the proof that one’s moral leanings are predetermined to stay very subjective. Rather, it must be seen reflective of those people’ lessened humanness – one thing that suggests the total objectivity of ‘moral facts’, even when we assume that they exist within the solely metaphysical area. This explains the Realist tackle ‘moral commonsense’. According to the speculation’s advocates, it represents the primary precept of how socially built-in people go about addressing life challenges, “Moral commonsense is what comes to us universally as the deepest and inescapable elements of all possible experience… Philosophies which deny these hard-core (moral) commonsense elements… are inescapably incoherent and irrational because they demand that we ignore or deny facts which we deeply know to be true” (Mesle, 2005, p. 137). To a Moral Realist, it issues little or no whether or not she or he can justify its ethical stance rationally – the solemn factor of significance, on this respect, is that it is just by assuming such a stance that one can obtain self-actualization, and to consequently really feel ‘real’, within the sense of being a morally upstanding individual.


The moral framework of ethical Realism displays a widely known proven fact that most individuals bask in ethical decision-making on an intuitive stage. What it means is that when uncovered to the Realist judgment, concerning a specific ethics-related subject material, they are going to possible discover it convincing. Another robust aspect of the moral principle in query is that it’s completely sensible, within the sense of offering intuitively sound and fast options to ethical disagreements.


The principle’s foremost weak point is that, although it certainly might show useful, because the instrument of addressing a specific ethical dilemma, it does little or no to elucidate the precise means of how individuals find yourself disagreeing on the issues of ethics, within the first place. What is much more – there’s merely no method to show the existence of ‘moral facts’ (as ‘things in themselves) empirically. As a result, moral Realism is being often referred to as nothing but yet another value-based irrational belief.

Why was the FCPA needed?

Moral Relativism

As it was mentioned earlier, regarding the theory of Moral relativism, its supporters believe that there can be no ‘universal morality for all, simply because different people tend to perceive the significance of the ethically relevant issues differently. At the same time, however, Moral relativists do admit that there is a necessity for the basic rules of ethically sound conduct to be unified to an extent – especially given the social implications of the ongoing process of Globalization. In its turn, this can be achieved by the mean of those presently in control of the global socio-cultural discourse forcing everybody else to accept their moral values – pure and simple. As of today, the US continues to enjoy dominance in the world, which is why it is natural for the FCPA to be applied extraterritorial. The logic behind this suggestion is as follows:

The reason why most Americans continue to enjoy comparatively high standards of living is that, as the global economic realities indicate, these people are in the position to afford to consume three times as much as they actually produce. What enables such a situation to persist is the fact that the US dollar serves as the world’s solely reserve foreign money – which means that FRS can commerce worthless inexperienced paper with the photographs of US Presidents for beneficial pure sources everywhere in the world. The exploited naturally understand this state of affairs as‘ unjust’, however it’s absolutely ‘just’ for American residents, because the precise beneficiaries – no matter what occurs to be their political, ethnic, or cultural background. In order to protect the present establishment, on this respect, the US should apply its authorized authority extraterritorial on a periodic foundation. In its flip, this presupposes that little or no regard must be given to the legal guidelines/nationwide pursuits of dependent nations, such because the nations of the EU, for instance (in order that they by no means take into account ‘rebelling’). The FCPA is available in slightly helpful, on this respect – due to it, the DOJ and SEC can harass nearly any international firm world wide, after having claimed it ‘corrupt’. In its flip, this helps to guarantee that: a) the undesirable competitors from international corporations is successfully handled; b) the wealthy and highly effective within the peripheral nations are discouraged from attempting to undermine America’s continuous dominance. Thus, America’s hegemony might final unopposed, which is able to enable most individuals on this nation to get pleasure from life – this serves as the perfect moral justification for the continuous enactment of the FCPA.

Moral Realism

When assessed from the angle of ethical Realism, the FCPA will seem absolutely justified, as nicely. The rationale behind this suggestion might be formulated as follows:

There might be only some doubts that bribing international officers is morally inappropriate – had it been not the case, individuals wouldn’t be experiencing a deep-seated sense of disgrace for having indulged within the involved exercise. And but, this seems to be precisely the case. Even in counties the place bribe-taking/receiving is culturally enforced (akin to China), the ‘mutually beneficial exchange of gifts’ (guanxi) is completed inconspicuously. At the identical time, nonetheless, corruption has all the time been an integral a part of social life, even in essentially the most civilized nations, which suggests that there should be some mysterious points to the difficulty in query. The greatest proof, on this respect, is that, no matter how emotionally comfy a specific individual might seem whereas giving or receiving a bribe, she or he nonetheless stays morally disgusted by what’s going on – even when not realizing it consciously. This explains the primary justification for the continuous enactment of the FCPA – the involved Federal legislation just isn’t there to solely punish corporations for deploying ethically questionable enterprise methods to achieve a aggressive benefit within the international market. Rather, it’s there to awaken ‘sleeping conscientiousness’ in businesspersons on a worldwide scale – that it, whatever the specifics of those individuals’s nationwide affiliation. After having heard of FCPA investigations, these people will probably be more likely to chorus from performing ‘corruptly’ themselves – all as a consequence of their realization (induced by the FCPA) of the ethical inappropriateness of any such habits.

FCPA case (SAP SE)

On February 1, 2016, the SEC introduced that the German-based producer of pc software program, SAP SE was to pay $3.7 million as compensation for having did not conduct enterprise (in Panama) in accordance with the FCPA’s provisions. In explicit, “An SEC investigation found that SAP’s deficient internal controls allowed a former SAP executive to pay $145,000 in bribes to a senior Panamanian government official and offer bribes to two others in exchange for lucrative sales contracts” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2016, para. 2). The scheme concerned qualifying one of many Company’s companions in Panama to obtain unusually excessive (as much as 82%) reductions on the strains of SAP SE merchandise. In its flip, this allowed the involved Panamanian operator to make use of the supposedly ‘saved’ funds to open an offshore account, out of which the Panamanian high-ranking authorities officers have been being paid bribes. The SEC certified the incident because the indication that “SAP failed to devise and maintain a sufficient system of internal accounting controls” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2016, para. 9). In addition, the SEC proceeded to press felony expenses in opposition to one of many Company’s senior executives Vicente Garcia – the event that resulted on this individual being sentenced to serve 22 months in jail.

Not positive in the event you can write a paper on The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by your self? We may help you
for less than $16.05 $11/web page
Learn More

SAP SE is the primary software-designing firm to have been discovered responsible below the FCPA, which means that the Act’s enforcers actively attempt to increase the vary of its applicability. As Silverstein identified, “The FCPA has certainly arrived in Silicon Valley. It’s there to stay” (2015, para. 17). Moreover, Garcia’s indictment confirms the validity of the suggestion that as time goes on; DOJ and SEC handle their FCPA-related duties in a way more aggressive method, as in comparison with what was once the case whilst latest, as twenty years in the past. According to Pacini (2012), “Over 80% of case filings in the decade ending in 2009 occurred during the years 2005-2009… Specifically, the majority of the cases filed contributing to this rise have involved criminal cases” (p. 553). The case of SAP SE is especially notable, on this respect. The motive for that is that, in full accordance with the talked about pattern, the Company refused to contemplate defending its good title within the courtroom of legislation whereas preferring to pay out the desired quantity to have the case ‘settled’. In its flip, this validates the sooner suggestion that, as of at this time, the FCPA is greatest mentioned because the authorized instrument of forcing commercially profitable international companies to pay ‘business tax’.

Why did the SAP SE act unethically?

Moral Relativist perspective

As it was identified earlier, ethical Relativism presupposes the absence of the universally relevant ethical standards for assessing the moral soundness of a specific plan of action. Consequently, this suggests that relating to evaluating the case of SAP SE from the ethical Relativist perspective, one might want to stay absolutely conscious of what sort of goal this Company’s indictment was indented to serve. The motive for that is that ethical Relativists would not have any illusions, as to the extremely subjective nature of the morality-based authorized judgments – the declare {that a} explicit international firm acts unethically solely stays legitimate for so long as it serves the sensible function of contributing to the upkeep of the at present dominant discourse of America’s hegemony. Had it been in any other case, the so-called ‘lobbying’ (an integral a part of the discourse Americana) would have been acknowledged for what it truly is – a totally legalized system of bribery within the US. This, nonetheless, just isn’t going to occur, as a result of such a hypothetical improvement would end in undermining America’s declare of being ‘divinely ordained’ to arbitrate morality-related points on this planet. Therefore, the precise motive why SAP SE has been discovered responsible of getting acted ‘corruptly’ in Panama has little or no to do with the truth that certainly one of its high managers was caught attempting to bribe some bureaucrats from this nation’s authorities. Rather, this explicit prevalence is greatest defined, concerning what sort of firm SAP SE actually is. And, it is not going to show too difficult to achieve precise perception, on this respect. SAP SE is the corporate, which all through the previous few years has been actively concerned in investing in numerous infrastructural tasks in Russia – therefore, transgressing the coverage of financial sanctions imposed in opposition to this nation by the US (Gazprom, SAP, 2016). This truth is well-known in enterprise circles, simply as the truth that it was specifically as a result of Company’s fame as ‘Russia’s buddy’ that it grew to become the topic of FCPA investigation. Apparently, the SEC determined to analyze SAP SE to point out the world what will occur to any Western-based public firm that defies the US coverage of attempting to undermine Russia’s energy – pure and easy. Therefore, when assessed from the angle of ethical Relativism, the involved improvement does make a lot sense, because it contributes to the legitimization of the American outlook on what accounts for the moral/unethical method of conducting enterprise. The legitimacy of this suggestion might be substantiated as follows:

According to the proponents of ethical Relativism, whereas in search of to validate their ethical beliefs within the eyes of others, individuals usually attempt to make sure that these beliefs evoke the notion of ‘omnipotence’ (Byrne, 2014). Apparently, the appliance of such an strategy, on their half, might be known as the precise supply of ‘relativist ethics’, as a result of human beings are unconsciously predisposed to understand essentially the most bodily imposing of them as those that characterize ‘natural’ authority. The similar applies to nations – it’s particularly essentially the most highly effective of them which might be within the place to outline the dynamics within the area of ethics on a worldwide scale. Therefore, there’s nothing odd about the truth that, after having been ordered to pay $3.7 million, SAP SE determined to not put up any authorized resistance – even though the Company was greater than able to doing it. The Company’s officers took the actual fact that SAP SE was singled out by the SEC to be investigated in opposition to, because the indication that the US certainly has some legitimate causes to fret about this German firm. Therefore, they determined to do as ordered – one thing that when once more justifies the moral appropriateness of the SEC’s ruling. This alone serves as the perfect proof that SAP SE did act unethically – no matter what often is the Company’s excuses, on this respect. After all, it does correlate nicely with the ethically Relativist concept that, although there isn’t a ‘universal’ morality for all, it’s specifically the morality of those that can impose it upon others forcibly that’s thought-about ‘mandatory’. In different phrases, to be thought-about ethically sound, a authorized verdict should be perceived indeniable – therefore, naturally inflicting its topics to simply accept it with out attempting to contend the decision’s sensible implications as a result of such a hypothetical improvement would solely make the scenario worse. In this respect, the case of SAP SE is exemplary. The actual fact that this firm agreed to pay the assigned fines with out questioning their legality serves as the perfect proof that it did should be penalized – even when the punishment doesn’t seem utterly unbiased.

Moral Realist perspective

Once subjected to the Realist evaluation, the SEC ruling in opposition to SAP SE will seem ethically justified, as nicely. The rationale behind this suggestion is clear – ethical Realism presupposes that one’s moral judgments by no means stop being reflective of some goal ‘moral facts’, which don’t have anything to do together with his or her tendency to stay strongly influenced by exterior circumstances whereas within the means of moralizing. One of those ‘moral facts’ might be thought-about the belief that bribery is mistaken – not solely due to this exercise’s strongly corruptive impact on society but in addition as a result of it’s morally repulsive as a ‘thing in itself. By having failed at ensuring the integrity of its ‘internal controls’, SAP SE has helped to create the target preconditions for certainly one of its high managers to be tempted to abuse his government powers. However, it’s not solely that the Company’s moral misconduct resulted in turning Panama into much more corrupt of a rustic than it already is – Garcia’s habits did contribute in the direction of making this world a way more depressing place to stay, as an entire. After all, based on the proponents of ethical Realism, it’s particularly individuals’s unwillingness to behave in full accordance with the talked about ‘moral facts’, which is the supply of nearly each evil on this Earth. Therefore, it is not going to be a lot of an exaggeration to counsel that the FCPA case of SAP SE is, actually, illustrative of what the speculation of ethical Realism is all about. This suggestion’s validity might be substantiated in relation to the next:

  • The FCPA investigation in query resulted in bringing about civil and felony expenses in opposition to SAP SE. This correlates with the speculation’s provision that there will not be solely descriptive but in addition normative points to how individuals understand the very notion of ‘ethics’. Because SAP SE intentionally violated various ‘moral facts’ (specified by the FCPA), it was solely logical for the Company to finish up struggling the implications – the event that confirms the Realist outlook on the metaphysical and but absolutely goal nature of such ‘facts’.
  • The punishment that SAR SE needed to face was something however overly extreme. After all, given the Company’s sheer dimension, the sum of $3.7 million in settlement fines might by no means show overly substantial for it. The similar might be mentioned about Garcia’s felony sentence – the acquired jail time period (lower than two years), on his half, means that he received off straightforward. What it means is that the SEC officers didn’t intention as a lot at punishing SAP SE, as they did at attempting to awaken the sense of ‘moral conscientiousness’ within the Company’s government officers, in order that they’d chorus from attempting to bribe international officers sooner or later. This is once more greatest defined inside the conceptual framework of the speculation of Moral Realism, which promotes the concept that even those that perpetrate ethically depraved deeds are compelled to take action below the strain of exterior circumstances.
  • The FCPA-covered investigation of SAP SE got here on account of the SEC has invoked the precept of extraterritoriality. This might be seen as yet one more indication of the truth that, simply as the speculation of ethical Realism implies, ‘moral facts’ are completely goal and never affected by whether or not individuals in a specific a part of the world are prepared to check with them as such or not.


In gentle of what has been mentioned earlier, it seems that there’s a strongly outlined utilitarian intricacy to the sensible deployment of nearly any moral principle. After all, because it was illustrated all through the paper’s earlier sub-chapters, it’s certainly attainable to justify the ethical appropriateness of FCPA instances even from the views of two mutually contradicting moral theories, akin to ethical Relativism and Moral Realism. What this implies is that the ethical analysis of a specific plan of action undertaken by an organization is essentially reflective of no matter occurred to be the non-public agenda of these in command of developing with such analysis. It is known, after all, that this conclusion helps the validity of specifically the Relativist outlook on ethics and on what must be deemed its social significance. Apparently, the functioning of the justice system in America can’t be mentioned as such that merely serves the aim of encouraging residents (and now foreigners) to chorus from indulging in unethical (felony) habits. Rather, it’s there to assist the US to take care of its political, financial, and navy dominance on the earth, which is the primary motive why the FCPA was enacted, within the first place. Therefore, the notion of ‘ethics’ is sure to stay each: extremely subjective and strongly instrumental. I consider that this discovering is absolutely in line with the paper’s preliminary thesis.


15 U.S.C. §78dd-1(a).

15 U.S.C. §78M(b)(2)(A) (2008).

Barker, Ok., Pacini, C., & Sinason, D. (2012). The international corrupt practices act: A legislation value revisiting. Review of Business, 32(2), 44-57.

Byrne, E. (2014). Towards enforceable bans on illicit companies: From ethical relativism to human rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 119-130.

Choi, S., & Davis, Ok. (2014). Foreign affairs and enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(3), 409-445.

Delapp, Ok. (2009). The deserves of dispositional Moral realism. Journal of Value Inquiry, 43(1), 1-18.

Gazprom, SAP to collectively create Russian software program manufacturing. (2016). Russia Business News. Web.

Hayry, M. (2005). A protection of Ethical relativism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14(1), 7-12.

Leibold, A. (2015). Extraterritorial utility of the FCPA below worldwide legislation. Willamette Law Review, 51(2), 225-267.

Marks, J. (2011). Thirteen Steps to FCPA Compliance. CPA Journal, 81(7), 11-13.

McDonald, G. (2010). Ethical relativism vs absolutism: Research implications. European Business Review, 22(4), 446-464.

Mesle, C. (2005). What let’s assume to the torturer? Moral realism, conscience, and human nature. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 26(1), 129-145.

Pacini, C. (2012). The Foreign Corrupt practices Act: Taking a chew out of bribery in worldwide enterprise transactions. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 17(2), 545-589.

Sebelius, N. (2008). Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The American Criminal Law Review, 45(2), 579-606.

Silverstein, E. (2015). Ex-SAP worker pleads responsible to FCPA violation. Inside Counsel. Breaking News. Web.

Tannsjo, T. (2007). Moral relativism. Philosophical Studies, 135(2), 123-143.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2016). SEC expenses software program firm with FCPA violations. Web.

U.S. v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, No. 08-CR-367-RJL (D.D.C. 2008).

Yockey, J. (2013). Choosing governance within the FCPA reform debate. Journal of Corporation Law, 38(2), 325-380.

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Order a Paper Now